61 Days of Halloween: Sleep Tight

Introduction

This is a post that is a repurposing of an old-school Mini-Review Round-Up post. As stated here I am essentially done with running multi-film review posts. Each film deserves its own review. Therefore I will repost, and at times add to, old reviews periodically. Enjoy!

Sleep Tight

Upon conferring on his IMDb page I am missing one feature from Jaume Balaguero’s filmography after having seen Sleep Tight. His films that worked for me thus far have worked exceedingly well, namely The Nameless, [REC] and [REC] 2. I barely recall it, but judging by my score of Darkness that was more of complete miss than either of his apartment tales (To Let and Sleep Tight).

Balaguero is still a director I’d put at the vanguard of the current Spanish horror scene due to his voice, and it’s why I want to complete his current filmography and why his name being attached to something still garners my interest.

With regards to these apartment tales, a lot of To Let‘s struggles I attribute to a restricted timeframe for an intimate, nebulous portrait to be painted, which is why half the Films to Keep You Awake titles are amazing, and why the other three are forgettable to poor. Here it’s not that there is anything inherently wrong, it’s more a question of insufficient build, unmoving voyeurism and predictable plot points with minimal impact. The actions and motivations are always fairly clear, which in a way makes this film less engaging than his other ventures. There’s a stark blandness and removal of encumbrance that’s supposed to compound the impact but instead dulls it.

In the end, Sleep Tight presents a portrait of a psychopath without an excess of depth, engagement or shock; it’s sadly flat.

4/10

Rewind Review: Nanny McPhee Returns

Introduction

As those who know me, and if such a person exists, cyberstalk me, know I created this blog after writing on another site, which shall remain nameless, for a while. The point is, I have material sitting around waiting to be re-used on occasion I will re-post them here. Some of those articles or reviews may have been extemporaneous at the time but are slightly random now, hence the new title and little intro, regardless enjoy!

Nanny McPhee Returns (2010)

Nanny McPhee returns is a fun film that avoids many of the trappings that typically hamper family-oriented entertainment either by curtailing these issues or outperforming the expectations of the given situations which we may find in many films.

One of the things that makes this film rather delightful and enjoyable is that situations which we are expecting or are set up are only as obstructive as necessary. A case in point would be Phil’s (Rhys Ifans) several attempts to get the farm, upon which our heroes live, sold to settle his debts. Each attempt is no longer and no more of an obstacle than necessary as villains can be both unfunny and overly imposing in family films. The first saving grace the family finds is the sale of prize pigs, he releases them they are recovered quickly enough and with the help of Nanny McPhee. This film also, however, manages to not de-fang its villain simply because he is thwarted quickly.

Both in Ifans’ performance and the tandem of Katy Brand and Sinead Matthews bring over-the-top quirkiness but also humor. There is a fine line between comedically and painfully over-the-top and they tread it smoothly with nary a misstep.

Emma Thompson is certainly to be applauded for the many good things she does with this story as a writer. There is a lovely dovetail into the first film at the very end but for all intents and purposes this is a film that is in no way dependent on its prior installment for you to enjoy it.

Also, there is minimal didacticism. Nanny McPhee is there to teach the children, cousins both from the country and the city who hadn’t met, five lessons. We are not told what each lesson is until it has been learned. While we are told many times that she will leave when she is wanted but no longer needed the clues as to how close she is to leaving are visual and unspoken.

Thompson is also quite funny in her deadpan reincarnation of this character. As a writer though she was again unafraid to let the children drive the story for the most part and has her fun with the supporting cast. The children are all a credit to the film and none, no matter how young, are so-cute-you-could-puke or in any other way annoying unless they are supposed to be and all of them do round out their characters at least to some extent.

Kudos are especially in order for the younger set: Asa Butterfield (who some may know from The Boy in the Striped Pajamas and even more will when he is in Martin Scorcese’s Hugo Cabret), Lil Woods, Eros Vlahos and Rosie Taylor-Ritson.

The only weak link in the cast is Maggie Gyllenhaal, who for some unknown reason is cast as a British housewife. Needless to say her accent isn’t the greatest and she is somewhat off overall here. The credit to her and the film is that you do eventually get past it.

Regardless, Nanny McPhee Returns is a very funny, heartfelt and fun film which likely supersedes its predecessor.

8/10

61 Days of Halloween: Come Out and Play

Come Out and Play

Whenever possible I try to give those who may be reading these reviews a frame of reference of where I’m coming from with a particular title. That can in large part become relevant when one discusses a remake. I believe I viewed Who Can Kill a Child? last year and I was not a fan in the slightest. When dealing with a remake, you want to try to have a clean slate, but I realize this can be difficult as certain things are expected. I liked this version just marginally and here’s why:

The biggest faults the film has are in the beginning and the end, there’s far too much unspoken and not enough urgency as the weird situations start to present themselves. I’ve not read the book, but so far as I’m concerned there’s not yet the perfect rendition of this tale, regardless of how faithful each may or may not be to the book.

As the film progresses further from the overly-coy beginning, it does start to address some concerns, seriously up the stakes and after some missteps in the suspense department early playing that up. The score is consistently effective, and the all-too-ghostly children start to have presence, a bit of information to them, which makes them more dangerous, and in turn makes the audience engage further. It creates some mystery and makes you interpret events after a minimal mandatory amount of information is handed out.

Where I feel the film could’ve further excelled was at the very, very end. However, what it manages to do after being a fairly ineffectual carbon copy elevates it oh-so-slightly from its predecessor.

6/10

Rewind Review: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)

The new Harry Potter film, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, is by far the most enjoyable, fully-realized and total experience that the series has yet to offer. There are a number of reasons why this is so. By a total experience what is meant is a feeling of being there, completely immersed in this world which Miss Rowling has created. It does not necessarily imply that it is the most faithful adaptation; in fact, It most certainly it is not. However, that matters not at all. Keep in mind that all the films have been on average two and one-half hours in length while the books became more titanic – starting at just over 300 pages and reaching as many as 700 or 800 pages depending on the volume. Cramming all of that detail into a film is not only impossible but can be counterproductive. It’s a case of be careful what you wish for. If only Erich Von Stroheim had shot a page-for-page adaptation of War and Peace way back when no one would ever have complained about cinematic adaptations again.
Almost every scene of the film starts with either a unique camera movement or some sort of visual signature (the Weasley’s stair case, Luna’s POV through glasses, the apparition of the memories, the crane over the three to the Death Eaters’ Secret meeting and the move from the Lavender-Ron kiss to Malfoy lurking). The series has most definitely gotten more kinetic and enveloping, moving as far away from the steady, cold and at times stagnant hand that in hindsight we now see that Columbus wielded.
The camera moving about as it does allows the fan’s eye to wander about and catch characters they know by name from the book just being involved as part of the action albeit quite indirectly. This film uses the featured extra better than many you will see and what a fantastic setting in which to use them so well. One thing the series had kind of lost was the tapestry of supporting characters that Rowling weaves so well and it became too much about Harry, Ron and Hermione so seeing Dean Thomas, Crabbe, Goyle, Seamus, Romilda Vane, Professor Flitwick and first years is helpful so that it is not as if they are walking about Hogwarts on their own.
The strength of this series has always been in its cast. In this installment more so than any others that was the case. The ensemble has always been exceptional, however, never have they all rose to such heights all in unison regardless of the amount of time they were allowed to play in this particular installment. Stand-outs from the supporting squad are Alan Rickman, as always incredible, but now especially as Snape becomes increasingly the center of focus and people begin to wonder about him in the story, he has never been more apt, understated and downright perfect. The man who steals the show in this film, however, would have to be Jim Broadbent as Professor Slughorn, in each Potter film a new professor has come into the fray and been one of the lynchpins that would allow the film to either sink or swim and perhaps no one else has so brilliantly stepped into the function as Broadbent. All the supporting cast could have their merits spewed ad nauseum, however, the last who deserves noting for his exceptional contribution is Michael Gambon as Albus Dumbledore. With the passing of Richard Harris following The Chamber of Secrets this critic was terribly worried about the fate of the franchise, would this replacement forced upon the production by fate cost it? Indeed, it has not. Gambon has put his own stamp on the part and affirmatively become Dumbledore and both he and his material were the best they have been to date.
As for the lead cast what more can be said? Daniel Radcliffe was his stoic usual self, he got to play humorous while “under the influence” and that was one of the best parts of the film, while his most emotional scene was somewhat lacking the filmmaking and the moment took over. Emma Watson is a movie star and there are just no two ways about it; and this film furthered what she had established a few films ago already. Last but certainly not least Rupert Grint might’ve had his best turn and his best material to work with to date. He was absolutely hilarious.
The film itself also has tremendous scenes that standout greatly and come immediately to mind when thinking of the title and will likely stand the test of time: The Unbreakable Vow, The Love Potion, Harry on Liquid Luck, Harry and Dumbledore in the Cave. The most compelling of these was most definitely the Unbreakable Vow in which all those in the scene were just dead on in every word, gesture and action.
Kloves’s script for this particular film may well have been his best as well because not only were events within this film effectively foreshadowed but also those in the two which will comprise The Deathly Hallows. The tweaks also worked great such as Dumbledore asking about Harry and Hermione’s situation.
As enjoyable as the other films were there was always something minor or intangible that held them back just slightly. For The Prisoner of Azkaban it was the freeze-frame ending with Harry’s voice over declaring “I solemnly swear that I’m up to no good.” This film is uninhibited, unhampered, comfortable, certain in itself, its actors and its material and there’s nothing not to like. When Dumbledore was taking Harry on the mission to find the Horcruxes this critic was surprised that point had been reached because the film just flew. It was fantastic.
10/10

Mini-Review: V/H/S

Introduction

This is a post that is a repurposing of an old-school Mini-Review Round-Up post. As stated here I am essentially done with running multi-film review posts. Each film deserves its own review. Therefore I will repost, and at times add to, old reviews periodically. Enjoy!

V/H/S

Yes, any anthology film by its very nature will have its ups and downs. You as a viewer will connect more with one piece or another, one section or another will be more well-executed or intriguing, especially if there are different writer(s) and/or director(s) handling each portion. This year I’ve taken to watching a lot more anthologies, which proliferate in horror more so than most genres. It has moments which are few and far between, set-ups are too long making it structurally askew in segments and in toto, acting is scarce; the frame of the story is fairly poor. This dereliction of pace and structure makes the two-hour total running time seem nearly double that.

For a frame of reference here are brief comparisons to other anthologies so you know where I’m coming from: From a Whisper to a Scream has a stand-out segment, this does not; Creepshow has a brilliant frame, this does not. V/H/S seems to seek a unified tonality and aesthetic that it doesn’t quite achieve, Tales from the Hood does. Theatre Bizarre is wildly inconsistent, this is fairly consistent in its terribleness.

1/10

Mini-Review: Hayride

Introduction

This is a post that is a repurposing of an old-school Mini-Review Round-Up post. As stated here I am essentially done with running multi-film review posts. Each film deserves its own review. Therefore I will repost, and at times add to, old reviews periodically. Enjoy!

Hayride

About the only thing Hayride does in something akin to a proper fashion is create a legend. However, that legend is lodged a bit too deep into the story, nearly usurped by others and leads up to quite a clunker of a climax.

The film spends a bit of time with its characters, which is fine as an isolated fact, but it’s less desirable when they are so simply drawn and so unconvincingly interpreted. There is a supposed hayride attraction that is incredibly poorly staged in both filmic and hayride terms. Lastly, there is the open ending which is not only expected but is quite nearly an anti-jolt. There are very small patches that show promise, but overall it’s quite a wasted effort.


2/10

Mini-Review: House of Bodies

House of Bodies

If you’ve ever wanted to see a feature that legitimately ought not be due to the fact that it’s essentially an under-edited short then this film is for you. There are two main parallel sequences that are drawn out: the former home of a mass-murderer that’s now the home base of a porno site, and a police interrogation room with said killer. The interrogation feels like it will be a springboard for early escalating events instead they lead to an anti-climactic discovery at the very end. I viewed this on Netflix and the story developed in the synopsis, which sounds like merely an inciting incident also takes too long to occur. Forget that the character who is the subject of the synopsis is non-existent for a quite a few minutes. The bottom line is there’s not enough story and while the running time is short the pace is glacial. I don’t know why Terrence Howard, Peter Fonda and Queen Latifah are in any way involved in this film, but they are and that’s unfortunate as there’s nothing they can do to save this hopelessly cockeyed in structure, scarcely flinching tale.

I was “glad” to learn when searching for photos that the director has publicly Tweeted that the finished version of the film is something he does not recognize. I’m sad to hear that’s happened, however, it doesn’t alter the fact that the film as it exists it nightmarish.

1/10

Review: Addicted to Fresno

Addicted to Fresno tells the story of two co-dependent sisters Martha (Natasha Lyonne) and Shannon (Judy Greer). Natasha is a lesbian, who is the more stable and responsible of the two and feels she always has to protect her sister and subjugates her own happiness. She helps out this time by getting Shannon a job after she is once again out of a rehab program for her sexual addiction.

This is the kind of film that takes a bit too much time to start going where it is predestined to, the lack all but the occasional minor surprise is a detriment to the film as well. It doesn’t offer enough modulation, and dimension for the characters until it’s too late to be salvaged. It thankfully doesn’t progress in to be the full-on trainwreck that the first act promises but its second and third act improvements do not ultimately salvage it but just make it tolerable.

The film does offer some laughs, and eventually takes a long hard look at these characters, it shows they do love one another and can examine their own and each other’s lives that pulls it from the realm of asshole cinema that it seems like its going to dwell in a strive for early on.

The performances bother from the leads; Natasha Lyonne who I have not seen enough of since her great debut in Everyone Says I Love You, is charming and relatable; Judy Greer who has recently garnered attention for her prodigious talents being under-utilized in blockbusters while having more screen time here seems to be an equally thankless position.

The standouts here in terms of memorable performances and comedic moments are actually the supporting players. Like Aubrey Plaza, as Martha’s love interest; Clea DuVall, who I also do not see enough of; Fred Armisen and Alison Tolman deliver with the greatest frequency and highest success; last but not least Ron Livingston.

All the players no matter how well they did are not well served by the script that feels like it could’ve used some polishing off, and the edit which could’ve truncated the tale so it’d move a bit better, especially at the denouement.

There’s slapstick potential that’s squandered in this film and that’s regrettable. The film in its patchwork way may find a cult of fans through Netflix or cable airings but will go down as ultimately forgettable and lamentable in my book.

3/10

Mini-Review: The Whisperer in the Darkness

Introduction

This is a post that is a repurposing of an old-school Mini-Review Round-Up post. As stated here I am essentially done with running multi-film review posts. Each film deserves its own review. Therefore I will repost, and at times add to, old reviews periodically. Enjoy!

The Whisperer in the Darkness

The Whisperer in Darkness was a film I just had to see. After having seen The Call of Cthulhu, which was a short, silent version of a Lovecraft classic, I knew I’d want to see anything this company (known as the H.P. Lovecraft Historical Society) did.

In their newest film, and first feature, they tackle The Whisperer in Darkness and shifted from a silent film representation to a monster film of the 1930s approach. In both cases, the style of film that is emulated perfectly suits the work being interpreted.

I firmly believe this to be the case, regardless of your familiarity with either of these very distinct niches. If you are unfamiliar with Lovecraft this is a great introduction as it very faithfully, but also intriguingly in cinematic terms, renders the narrative. Any admirer of film, regardless of what era(s) they prefer, will recognize some of the conventions on display in this film, and as details of the narrative unfold it’ll become clear the choice is an inspired one.

Much of this is a roundabout way of saying that odds are you’ll like this if you go in with the knowledge of what the film is attempting, and you could be a fan of either or neither end of the narrative equation and walk away liking it. However, if you like both it’s rather heavenly, or should I say hellacious? Either way, it’s great stuff.

10/10

Announcement: Hollywood’s Hispanic Heritage Blogathon 2015

An October blogathon a-comin’. I will be discussing the films of the talented, versatile auteur Robert Rodriguez!

Aurora's avatarOnce upon a screen...

Hispanic Heritage Month, whose roots go back to 1968, begins each year on September 15 and ends on October 15.  In celebration I am reprising the Hollywood’s Hispanic Heritage Blogathon to commemorate the imprint Hispanics have made on Hollywood.  I’m excited to continue with what I hope will be a yearly event that spotlights unfamiliar or all-too-often forgotten Hollywood players and movies.

Hollywood's Hispanic Heritage Blogathon 2

You may remember that Kay of Movie Star Makeover co-hosted this event with me last year.  I’m sad to say she is unable to fulfill hosting duties this year so I am going it alone and hope that she is at least able to participate.  It wouldn’t be the same without her.

Last year’s event proved both enriching and entertaining and I’m hoping to top that.  Here are a few topic guidelines…

Topics:

I welcome posts celebrating Hispanic Heritage in Hollywood that focus on actors, filmmakers or films that celebrate…

View original post 478 more words