Short Film Saturday: The Sorcerer’s Apprentice

If you’re like me and you absolutely couldn’t stand the new version of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice that was foisted upon us than have a gander below at the original intent. Minus the introduction which I believe is from the rehash Fantasia 2000, it is without dialogue. It is wordless and symphonic leaving you to marvel at good old cel animation and simple well-executed story.


It’s surprising that Disney has done nothing to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the film perhaps that is waiting five years for the 75th- so be on the lookout in 2015. I was never a huge fan of the film as a whole but this was always my favorite segment and perhaps that realization brings a new axiom into the mix: “you don’t know what you got ’til it’s remade.”

Contenders for Favorite Older Film First Seen in 2012

Lee Montgomery in Burnt Offerings one of my favorite older films of 2011. (United Artists)

UPDATE: Due to the strong focus I give to 2012 titles in late November and December, this list of possibilities is virtually complete. It will be whittled down and written up for posting in early January!

This post really serves a few purposes. First it’ll track the possibilities for a year end list. The first edition of it can be found here. Second, I’ll also be posting this list on my Letterboxd account, if you use it you can follow me there my user name is Bernardo Villela just as it is on Twitter.

This year I may include a shorts section but that will remain a secret. here are but the features.

1. Big Red
2. This is England
3. Peeping Tom
4. Make a Wish
5. The Boy Who Cried Werewolf (1973)
6. The Glass Child
7. Rawhead Rex
8. Blood & Roses
9. The Drum
10. The Comedy of Terrors
11. House of Dark Shadows
12. The Fallen Idol
13. Scrooge
14. Indiscretion of an American Housewife
15. Wait Until Dark
16. Wild Boys of the Road
17. The Window
18. Frenzy
19. Thief of Bagdad
20. Mrs. Parkington
21. Bless the Beasts & Children
22. The Masque of the Red Death
23. Visages d’enfants
24. Spectre
25. A Child Called Jesus
26. Christmas Tale
27. Big Business
28. Death and Cremation
29. Goobers! (fka Mystery Monsters)
30. 28 Up
31. Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog
32. 42 Up
33. The Life and Passion of Jesus (1905)
34. From the Manger to the Cross (1912)
35. Coriolanus
36. No Greater Glory
37. The Manster
38. Only When I Dance
39. The Birds
40. Island of Lost Souls
41. The House of Usher
42. Summer Interlude
43. Tales from the Hood
44. The War of the Buttons (1994)
45. Where the River Runs Black
46. Only When I Dance
47. Lil’ A (Short)
48. The Birds
49. Island of Lost Souls
50. Summer Interlude
51. The House of Usher
52. Brats (1930)
53. Always
54. Jet Boy
55. Emil and the Detectives
56. Student Bodies
57. The Devil and the Statue
58. Gulliver’s Travels Among the Lilliputians and Giants
59. The Kingdom of the Fairies
60. The Eclipse, or The Courtship of the Sun and Moon
61. The Conquest of the Pole
62. Frankenstein and the Monster from Hell
63. Ghost Town (1988)
64. Lady in White (1988)
65. The Mummy (1932)
66. Planet of the Vampires
67. O Pagador de Promessas (The Promise Keeper)
68. Salome
69. The Forbidden
70. The Omen III: The Final Conflict
71. Chabelo y Pepito Contra los Monstruos
72. Hellphone
73. Hansel & Gretel
74. Aro Tolbukhin: In the Mind of a Killer
75. House of Long Shadows
76. The Final
77. The Thing from Another World
78. A Shot in the Excitment
79. The Rape of the Vampire
80. Wes Craven’s New Nightmare
81. The White Shadow

The 1998 BAM Awards

Introduction

As those who are my friends on Facebook, or follow me on Twitter know, in December I am gearing up for my annual film awards (The BAM Awards), and that only partially explains my recent reposting of all past winners.

Since these are picks made by one person, the nominating process is even more important. Aside from the the past years, the full slate of nominees from all years past was not public knowledge.

This is because the first time I did them, in 1996, I created them by myself, for myself. At the time, I knew a lot less about how these decisions are made, campaigning, the year-end barrage of contenders and the like, such that the releasing of the Academy Award nominees was more frustrating than it could be otherwise. Rather than just bemoan it I decided to create an award slate based on what I had seen.

Back then I was ticket-stub pack rat, at the time it was the only way I had to track anything. So I created the list, picked winners and printed it out. The fact that I stuck with hard copies and no back-up created issues later. However, it was just for me at the time.

I called them the BAM Awards because I needed a name. I suppose I came up with Bernardo Academy of Movies because I was being reactionary to The Academy. How one man by himself can be an Academy I didn’t fully consider. I thought it was kind of a silly name, even at the time, so eventually it just became the BAM Awards.

Slowly, the awards widened: soon I emailed a select group of friends (that created eventual storage issues), a few years ago when I was on the Site That Must Not Be Named I decided to really take it public. I didn’t think about it ahead of time, it just occurred to me roundabout late November of ’09 that I could.

The publication was an exciting and unnerving process, regardless of how many or how few people would actually care to see them. While there are a two categories (which I now and again consider ending, and have skipped on occasion) which are negative, it is a positive emotion that brings me to these announcements. I want to at the end of the year share what I thought and why, and all winner announcements come with some explanation, and I do belabor them and struggle with them.

So it is heartening that last year, for the first time, the actual honorees, be they nominees or winners, on occasion acknowledged it. Now that may seem like a self-aggrandizing statement, but what I liked was knowing the news reached them, and other people, and they were pleased to hear it. The design of these awards are to cement what performances, works and films most affected me, I make no bones about that, and sharing that felt like a gamble, but it’s been rewarding for that and many other reason.

Of course, if you see a film missing from any year you may inquire, and there is room for intelligent discourse, but the above statements are true: trolling or disrespectful comments aimed at those chosen won’t be tolerated. Your own awards are just a blog post away.

I apologize for even needing to insert that statement but I did have cause to make similar points last year. Anyway, with how much I enjoyed last year’s and how much I’m looking forward to this year’s awards, I thought it’d be a good idea to put all I have out there in a “reverse” countdown, a count -up if you will.

So here goes…

1998

Here are some tidbits as they pertain to this year in the BAM Awards.

-This is the first time a film earned double-digit nominations.

-This was the first time a film not in the English Language won Best Picture. Another reason the Foreign Language process is a bit convoluted in the Oscars is that only official submissions of nations are eligible. Any and all foreign films are eligible at the BAM Awards.

-This is the first director-film split. Kind of hard to argue against Spielberg‘s work in Ryan though.

-Here again you see young performers in all categories. Predicting the need for equality in acting categories.

This is Nick Nolte’s 3rd nomination and 2nd win. He is the first actor to win both in lead and supporting categories.

Actresses Jessica Lange and Melanie Griffith get 2nd nominations.

This marks Janusz Kaminski’s 3rd nomination and 2nd win for Cinematography

Winners are BOLD and pictured. Also, if you’re a stat geek (like I am), I’ll be compiling these observations and more in a post when these are done. Things like writer credits will be taken into account, and incorporated into that post.

Best Picture

Central Station (1998, Sony Pictures Classics)

As Good as It Gets
Central do Brasil
The Mighty
U Turn
Wide Awake

Best Director

Steven Spielberg (DreamWorks)

James L. Brooks As Good as It Gets
Walter Salles Central do Brasil
Oliver Stone U Turn
M. Night Shyamalan Wide Awake
Steven Spielberg Saving Private Ryan

Best Actor

As Good As It Gets (1997, TriStar Pictures)

Vinícius de Oliveira Central do Brasil
Jack Nicholson As Good as It Gets
Kieran Culkin The Mighty
Samuel L. Jackson The Negotiator
Joseph Cross Wide Awake

Best Actress

Central Station (1998, Sony Pictures Classics)

Helen Hunt As Good as It Gets
Jessica Lange Hush
Fernanda Montenegro Central do Brasil
Dominique Swain Lolita
Sharon Stone Sphere

Best Supporting Actor

U Turn (1997, TriStar Pictures)

Nick Nolte U Turn
Edward Norton American History X
Kevin Spacey The Negotiator
Ian McKellen Apt Pupil
Ed Harris The Truman Show

Best Supporting Actress

Central Station (1998, Sony Pictures Classics)

Sharon Stone The Mighty
Marília Pêra Central do Brasil
Jennifer Lopez U Turn
Alexandra Dahlström Show Me Love
Melanie Griffith Lolita

Best Visual Effects

Small Soldiers (1998, Universal/DreamWorks)

U Turn
What Dreams May Come
Sphere
Small Soldiers
The Faculty

Best Original Screenplay

Central Station (1998, Sony Pictures Classics)

M. Night Shyamalan Wide Awake
Robert Rodat Saving Private Ryan
Lukas Moodyson Show Me Love
James DeMonaco and Kevin Fox The Negotiator
Marcos Bernstein, João Emanuel Carneiro and Walter Salles Central do Brasil

Best Adapted Screenplay

The Mighty (1998, Miramax)

John Ridley U Turn
Rodman Philbrick and Charles Leavitt The Mighty
Eddie Little, Christopher B. Landon and Stephen Chin Another Day in Paradise
Brandon Cole and John Turturro Illuminata
Michael Crichton, Kurt Wimmer, Paul Attanasio and Stephen Hauser Sphere

Best Cinematography

Saving Private Ryan (1998, DreamWorks)

Janusz Kaminski Saving Private Ryan
Walter Carvalho Central do Brasil
Sven Nyqvist Celebrity
Ulf Brantås Show Me Love
Adam Holander Wide Awake

Best Score

Central Station (1998, Sony Pictures Classics)

Antonio Pinto and Jacques Morelebaum Central do Brasil
Bill Whalen Dancing at Lughnasa
John Williams Saving Private Ryan
Elliot Goldenthal Sphere
Ennio Morricone U Turn

Best Performance by a Child Actor

Central Station (1998, Sony Pictures Classics)

Vinícius de Oliveira Central do Brasil
Joseph Cross Wide Awake
Kieran Culkin The Mighty
Dominique Swain Lolita
Jeremy James Kissner Great Expectations

Best Cast

As Good As It Gets (1997, TriStar Pictures)

Central do Brasil
Saving Private Ryan
As Good as It Gets
Illuminata
U Turn

Most Underrated Film

Wide Awake (1998, Miramax)

Hush
Lolita
Wide Awake
U Turn
The Mighty

Most Overrated Film

There's Something About Mary (1998, 20th Century Fox)

There’s Something About Mary
Luminous Motion
Living Out Loud
Shadrach
Great Expectations

Worst Film

The Secret Kingdom (1998, Amazing Fantasy Entertainment)

Hurlyburly
The Secret Kingdom
There’s Something About Mary
Billboard Dad
Billy Frankenstein

Nominations

Central do Brasil 10
U Turn 9
Wide Awake 7
The Mighty 6
As Good as it Gets 5
Saving Private Ryan 5
Lolita 4
Sphere 4
Show Me Love 3
The Negotiator 3
Hush 2
Great Expectations 2
There’s Something About Mary 2
American History X 1
Apt Pupil 1
The Truman Show 1
What Dreams May Come 1
Small Soldiers 1
The Faculty 1
Another Day in Paradise 1
Illuminata 1
Celebrity 1
Dancing at Lughansa 1
Luminous Motion 1
Living Out Loud 1
Shadrach 1
Hurlyburly 1
The Secret Kingdom 1
Billboard Dad 1
Billy Frankenstein 1

The 1997 BAM Awards

Introduction

As those who are my friends on Facebook, or follow me on Twitter know, in December I am gearing up for my annual film awards (The BAM Awards), and that only partially explains my recent reposting of all past winners.

Since these are picks made by one person, the nominating process is even more important. Aside from the the past years, the full slate of nominees from all years past was not public knowledge.

This is because the first time I did them, in 1996, I created them by myself, for myself. At the time, I knew a lot less about how these decisions are made, campaigning, the year-end barrage of contenders and the like, such that the releasing of the Academy Award nominees was more frustrating than it could be otherwise. Rather than just bemoan it I decided to create an award slate based on what I had seen.

Back then I was ticket-stub pack rat, at the time it was the only way I had to track anything. So I created the list, picked winners and printed it out. The fact that I stuck with hard copies and no back-up created issues later. However, it was just for me at the time.

I called them the BAM Awards because I needed a name. I suppose I came up with Bernardo Academy of Movies because I was being reactionary to The Academy. How one man by himself can be an Academy I didn’t fully consider. I thought it was kind of a silly name, even at the time, so eventually it just became the BAM Awards.

Slowly, the awards widened: soon I emailed a select group of friends (that created eventual storage issues), a few years ago when I was on the Site That Must Not Be Named I decided to really take it public. I didn’t think about it ahead of time, it just occurred to me roundabout late November of ’09 that I could.

The publication was an exciting and unnerving process, regardless of how many or how few people would actually care to see them. While there are a two categories (which I now and again consider ending, and have skipped on occasion) which are negative, it is a positive emotion that brings me to these announcements. I want to at the end of the year share what I thought and why, and all winner announcements come with some explanation, and I do belabor them and struggle with them.

So it is heartening that last year, for the first time, the actual honorees, be they nominees or winners, on occasion acknowledged it. Now that may seem like a self-aggrandizing statement, but what I liked was knowing the news reached them, and other people, and they were pleased to hear it. The design of these awards are to cement what performances, works and films most affected me, I make no bones about that, and sharing that felt like a gamble, but it’s been rewarding for that and many other reasons.

Of course, if you see a film missing from any year you may inquire, and there is room for intelligent discourse, but the above statements are true: trolling or disrespectful comments aimed at those chosen won’t be tolerated. Your own awards are just a blog post away.

I apologize for even needing to insert that statement but I did have cause to make similar points last year. Anyway, with how much I enjoyed last year’s and how much I’m looking forward to this year’s awards, I thought it’d be a good idea to put all I have out there in a “reverse” countdown, a count -up if you will.

So here goes…

1997

The fact of the matter is whether I’ve referred to it as The Titus Conundrum or “The Butcher Boy Rule” late-year release dates have long been an issue I’ve had to contend with. When it comes to thew 2012 edition I will explain what counted and what didn’t just note that in past years there will likely be year-end limited releases shifted into the following year.

-Yes, this one had revisions in later years, and it lead to a goof I’ve left intact. I accidentally assigned Little Men to 1997 even though it was released in 1998. This is a prime example of why I’m not into revisionism any longer. This error was made about 10 years ago I’d guess, has been perpetuated and I have no records as to what it replaced. So this year, like 2003 where I lost the nominees and only have the winners bears a blemish. Alas, this is why I lament my storage concerns above. Had I only known I’d keep them.

– Again, there are lots of comedy nominees here. Porbably many more when I was younger but they always seem to be aroun. In this year they are: Mike Myers, Meg Ryan, Scott Thompson, Lisa Kudrow and Jeneane Garofalo.

-Henry Thomas was the first performer to be nominated for multiple films in the same year (Actor, Supporting Actor and Cast (twice)).

-If you look carefully at the 1996 nominees you’ll notice logical conundrums so far as acting nominations are concerned, namely young actors in open categories snubbed in the young ctor category. Another reason Young Actor categories needed expanding. Here it occurs anew. Recently, much deliberation has been spent trying to reason a split. A picture/director split occurs here, which is rare and I typically have good cause for it. Usually it has to to with the driving force of vision. Mandt and Thronton each played similar roles in their films and awards were divvied accordingly.

Romy & Michelle’s High School Reunion and A Thousand Acres each had three acting nominations, but no others.

-Janusz Kaminski is the first person nominated twice in the same category in the same year.

Lost World does end up in worst of the year but nominated and winning in others. I try and compartmentalized that and there were many fewer films in the running back then.

-Charlie Sheen has been a in a Worst Picture winner, Emilio Estevez has not.

Winners are BOLD and pictured.

Best Picture

Sling Blade (1996, Miramax)

The Sweet Hereafter
Hijacking Hollywood
Contact
Sling Blade
Mother Night

Best Director

NeilMandt

Atom Egoyan The Sweet Hereafter
Neil Mandt Hijacking Hollywood
Robert Zemeckis Contact
Billy Bob Thronton Sling Blade
Keith Gordon Mother Night

Best Actor

Sling Blade (1996, Miramax)

Nick Nolte Mother Night
Henry Thomas Hijacking Hollywood
Billy Bob Thornton Sling Blade
Mike Myers Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery
Dominic Zamprogna The Boy’s Club

Best Actress

Contact (1997, Warner Bros.)

Jodie Foster Contact
Jena Malone Bastard Out of Carolina
Jessica Lange A Thousand Acres
Mira Sorvino Romy and Michelle’s High School Reunion
Meg Ryan Addicted to Love

Best Supporting Actor

Sling Blade (1996, Miramax)

Henry Thomas Suicide Kings
Lucas Black Sling Blade
Dustin Hoffman Wag the Dog
Jason Robards A Thousand Acres
Scott Thompson Hijacking Hollywood

Best Supporting Actress

A Thousand Acres (1997, Touchstone Pictures)

Michelle Pfeiffer A Thousand Acres
Jena Malone Contact
Jeaneane Garofalo Romy and Michelle’s High School Reunion
Lisa Kudrow Romy and Michelle’s High School Reunion
Julianne Moore Boogie Nights

Best Cinematography

Mother Night (1996, Fine Line Features)

Tom Richmond Mother Night
Janusz Kaminski Amistad
Janusz Kaminski Jurassic Park: The Lost World
Don Burgess Contact
Peter Deming Lost Highway

Best Score

John Williams Jurassic Park: The Lost World
George Clinton Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery
Mychael Danna The Sweet Hearafter
Mark Korven Cube
Milan Khymlicka Little Men

Best Visual Effects

Jurassic Park 2: The Lost World (Universal)

Jurassic Park 2: The Lost World (Universal)

Cube
Contact
Jurassic Park: The Lost World
Snow White: A Tale of Terror
The Peacemaker

Best Original Screenplay

Neil Mandt

Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery
Addicted to Love
Deconstructing Harry
Hijacking Hollywood
Uncle Sam

Best Adapted Screenplay

Contact (1997, Touchstone Pictures)

Little Men
Contact
Sling Blade
Snow White: A Tale of Terror
The Sweet Hereafter

Best Performance by a Child Actor

Bastard Out of Carolina (1996, Showtime)

Jena Malone Bastard Out of Carolina
Lucas Black Sling Blade
Dominic Zamprogna The Boy’s Club
Ben Cook Little Men
Joseph Ashton The Education of Little Tree

Most Underrated Film

Little Men (1997, Warner Bros.)

Hijacking Hollywood
The Education of Little Tree
Contact
Little Men
The Peacemaker

Most Overrated Film

Life is Beautiful (1997, Miramax)

La Vita é Bella
Afterglow
The Ice Storm
Boogie Nights
Men in Black

Worst Film

Bad Day on the Block (1996, Largo Entertainment)

Lost Highway
Leave it to Beaver
Bad Day on the Block
Shadowbuilder
Jurassic Park II: The Lost World

Best Cast

Hijacking Hollywood (1997, Curb Entertainment)

Suicide Kings
Hijacking Hollywood
Sling Blade
Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery
O Que é Isso Companheiro?

Nominations

Contact 8
Sling Blade 7
Hijacking Hollywood 7
The Sweet Hereafter 4
Mother Night 4
Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery 4
Little Men 4
A Thousand Acres 3
Romy & Michelle’s High School Reunion 3
Jurassic Park: The Lost World 3
Addicted to Love 2
The Boy’s Club 2
Bastard Out of Carolina 2
The Suicide Kings 2
Boogie Nights 2
Lost Highway 2
Cube 2
The Education of Little Tree 2
Peacemaker 2
Amistad 1
La Vita é Bella 1
Afterglow 1
The Ice Storm 1
Men in Black 1
Leave it to Beaver 1
Bad Day on the Block 1
Shadowbuilder 1
O Que é Isso Companheiro? 1
Snow White: A Tale of Terror 1

The 1996 BAM Awards

Introduction

As those who are my friends on Facebook, or follow me on Twitter know, in December I am gearing up for my annual film awards (The BAM Awards), and that only partially explains my recent reposting of all past winners.

Since these are picks made by one person, the nominating process is even more important. Aside from the the past years, the full slate of nominees from all years past was not public knowledge.

This is because the first time I did them, in 1996, I created them by myself, for myself. At the time, I knew a lot less about how these decisions are made, campaigning, the year-end barrage of contenders and the like, such that the releasing of the Academy Award nominees was more frustrating than it could be otherwise. Rather than just bemoan it I decided to create an award slate based on what I had seen.

Back then I was ticket-stub pack rat, at the time it was the only way I had to track anything. So I created the list, picked winners and printed it out. The fact that I stuck with hard copies and no back-up created issues later. However, it was just for me at the time.

I called them the BAM Awards because I needed a name. I suppose I came up with Bernardo Academy of Movies because I was being reactionary to The Academy. How one man by himself can be an Academy I didn’t fully consider. I thought it was kind of a silly name, even at the time, so eventually it just became the BAM Awards.

Slowly, the awards widened: soon I emailed a select group of friends (that created eventual storage issues), a few years ago when I was on the Site That Must Not Be Named I decided to really take it public. I didn’t think about it ahead of time, it just occurred to me roundabout late November of ’09 that I could.

The publication was an exciting and unnerving process, regardless of how many or how few people would actually care to see them. While there are a two categories (which I now and again consider ending, and have skipped on occasion) which are negative, it is a positive emotion that brings me to these announcements. I want to at the end of the year share what I thought and why, and all winner announcements come with some explanation, and I do belabor them and struggle with them.

So it is heartening that last year, for the first time, the actual honorees, be they nominees or winners, on occasion acknowledged it. Now that may seem like a self-aggrandizing statement, but what I liked was knowing the news reached them, and other people, and they were pleased to hear it. The design of these awards are to cement what performances, works and films most affected me, I make no bones about that, and sharing that felt like a gamble, but it’s been rewarding for that and many other reason.

Of course, if you see a film missing from any year you may inquire, and there is room for intelligent discourse, but the above statements are true: trolling or disrespectful comments aimed at those chosen won’t be tolerated. Your own awards are just a blog post away.

I apologize for even needing to insert that statement but I did have cause to make similar points last year. Anyway, with how much I enjoyed last year’s and how much I’m looking forward to this year’s awards, I thought it’d be a good idea to put all I have out there in a “reverse” countdown, a count -up if you will.

So here goes…

1996

As I have mentioned in that past, as the years moved on I tried to back track to my year of birth, and before I shared them I made changes, but since then I’ve taken the approach that it’s really a yearbook. I’m capturing my own personal zeitgeist.

So in the first few years there’s some muddling between how it was in the year of and how it was in the years after, but it’s mostly identical, about 90% plus for this year, they get more immutable as the years pass.

Some general observations here:

-One thing I’ve always had a tendency to do is include comedic performances, see Carrey, Williams, Hawn, Alda, and all but one of the Supporting Actress nominees.

-With behind-the-scenes positions I’ve gone back and forth between wanting to learn the name of every person under consideration and just judging the work and finding the name later. Most of this year I’ve done the latter.

-Any newer award, it would seem, adds a category to to try and stand apart; I added three. I’ve done more of this as the years have passed but the first was adding a category for young actors. This has since expanded.

-I’ve altered the order I’ve written these in. This is presented “as is.”

Winners are in BOLD and pictured.

Best Picture

Mulholland Falls (1996, MGM)

Bound
Everyone Says I Love You
Freeway
Harriet the Spy
Mulholland Falls

Best Director

https://themovierat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/ltamahori.jpg?w=400&h=267

Woody Allen Everyone Says I Love You
Ben Stiller The Cable Guy
Matthew Bright Freeway
Francis Ford Coppola Jack
Lee Tamahori Mulholland Falls

Best Actor

Mulholland Falls (1996, MGM)

Nick Nolte Mulholland Falls
Jim Carrey The Cable Guy
Kiefer Sutherland Freeway
Robin Williams Jack
Mel Gibson Ransom

Best Actress

Freeway (1996, Republic Pictures)

Reese Witherspoon Freeway
Michelle Trachtenberg Harriet the Spy
Goldie Hawn The First Wives Club
Carla Gugino Jaded
Sonia Braga Tieta do Agreste

Best Supporting Actor

Mulholland Falls (1996, MGM))

Tony Shaloub Big Night
Chazz Palminteri Mulholland Falls
Alan Alda Everyone Says I Love You
Gregory Smith Harriet the Spy
John Leguizamo Romeo + Juliet

Best Supporting Actress

Mulholland Falls (1996, MGM)

Diane Keaton The First Wives Club
Bette Middler The First Wives Club
Natasha Lyonne Everyone Says I Love You
Melanie Griffith Mulholland Falls
Marília Pêra Tieta do Agreste

Best Original Screenplay

https://themovierat.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/tout_le_monde_dit_i_love_you_everyone_says_i_love_you_1997_reference.jpg?w=600&h=401

The Kids in the Hall: Brain Candy
Everyone Says I Love You
Freeway
The Cable Guy
Mulholland Falls

Best Adapted Screenplay

Harriet the Spy (1996, Nickelodeon/Paramount)

Mystery Science Theatre 3000: The Movie
Harriet the Spy
Mondo
A Midsummer-Night’s Dream
Tieta do Agreste

Best Cinematography

Romeo + Juliet (1996, 20th Century Fox)

Eric Guichard Mondo
Edgar Moura Tieta do Agreste
Donald McAlpine Romeo + Juliet
Ian Wilson A Midsummer-Night’s Dream
Haskell Wexler Mulholland Falls

Best Score

Howard Shore and Adam Schlesinger That Thing You Do!
Caetano Veloso Tieta do Agreste
Jamshied Sharifi Harriet the Spy
John Ottman The Cable Guy
Dick Hyman Everyone Says I Love You

Best Visual Effects

Independence Day (1996, 20th Century Fox)

Independence Day
Mars Attacks!
Mondo

Best Performance by a Child Actor

Harriet the Spy (1996, Nickelodeon/Paramount)

Michelle Trachtenberg Harriet the Spy
Gregory Smith Harriet the Spy
Adam Zolotin Jack
Mario Yedidia Jack
Brawley Nolte Ransom

Most Overrated

Fargo (1996, Miramax)

The English Patient
Fargo
One Fine Day
Independence Day
Romeo + Juliet

Most Underrated Film

Harriet the Spy (1996, Nickelodeon/Paramount)

Mulholland Falls
Harriet the Spy
Jack
The Cable Guy
Mars Attacks!

Worst Film

Fever Lake (1996)

Fargo
The English Patient
Kazaam
Fever Lake
Girl 6

Best Cast

Mulholland Falls (1996, MGM)

Jack
Harriet the Spy
Everyone Says I Love You
Mulholland Falls

Freeway

NOMINATIONS

Harriet the Spy- 9
Mulholland Falls- 9
Everyone Says I Love You- 7
Jack-6
Freeway- 6
The Cable Guy- 5
Tieta do Agreste- 5
Mondo- 3
The First Wives Club- 3
Romeo + Juliet- 3
A Midsummer-Night’s Dream- 2
Independence Day- 2
Mars Attacks!- 2
The English Patient-2
Fargo- 2
Bound, Jaded, Diabolique, Kids in the Hall: Brain Candy, Mystery Science Theatre 3000: The Movie, That Thing You Do!, One Fine Day, Kazaam, Fever Lake, Girl 6, Bastard Out of Carolina-1

Short Film Saturday: Alice in Wonderland

If you saw the new Alice in Wonderland and absolutely could not stand it then this may be the antidote:

The first adaptation of the story on film in the world has recently been restored by the British Film Institute, BFI. It was recently posted on their YouTube page.

This is just some of the amazing and important work that film institutes do and this short encapsulates the magic of cinema. These images shot nearly 109 years ago can still be seen today in a world, especially the film world, these makers could never have imagined.

Here is more information about this particular version of the film from the YouTube description:

“The first-ever film version of Lewis Carroll’s tale has recently been restored by the BFI National Archive from severely damaged materials. Made just 37 years after Lewis Carroll wrote his novel and eight years after the birth of cinema, the adaptation was directed by Cecil Hepworth and Percy Stow, and was based on Sir John Tenniel’s original illustrations. In an act that was to echo more than 100 years later, Hepworth cast his wife as the Red Queen, and he himself appears as the Frog Footman. Even the Cheshire cat is played by a family pet. With a running time of just 12 minutes (8 of which survive), Alice in Wonderland was the longest film produced in England at that time. Film archivists have been able to restore the film’s original colors for the first time in over 100 years.”

Paranormal Activity 4 and the Found Footage Problem

This year saw another installation in the Paranormal Activity series. I will not bemoan the perpetuation of the series. I understand that. They cost virtually no money and the profit margins have been fairly huge. As a business decision, it’s a no brainer.

When writing about the first installment of this series, removing the marketing scheme which was brilliant and the hoopla, I complained it was like a surprise symphony.

I have not given up on the series entirely and what I find odd is that each film has done something, in a particular section of the film, that if removed (as if that were possible) and combined with another section of another installment, would make a whole enjoyable horror film.

The main issue that this series has confronted in the sequels is that it hasn’t broken far enough away from the formula that the initial film established. If one looks at any lengthy horror series almost any of them will have a film that bucks the trend. Now, of course, that could backfire but at least it’s an attempt to shake things up.

What part three does best is have payoffs and a fairly good climax, but the build-up as per usual is fairly mind-numbing. In this recent installation certain motifs and twists are introduced, but it ultimately builds to something we’ve all seen before. Whether you’re a fan of the series or not, it’s not a progressive move.

Even purists couldn’t argue that the Halloween and Friday the 13th series kept trying to up the ante and find new avenues by which to lead into their new tales. What I can give to the first part is that it does catch you off guard, but the set-ups for the very modest scares are are too long, this film at least progressed (to an extent) the visual aesthetic.

Part of the dereliction of the series can be attributed to fear of rocking the boat, but the other part hinges on the found footage element. More often than not the found footage approach is used as a crutch rather than a license, or a challenge, to be more creative.

In four, I was very close to liking it, but they felt beholden to the formula.

Ultimately, how vital either this series or implementation of the found footage technique will be how varied, creative and unique the footage sources are. The image quality can be degraded but an over-abundence of static, uncut images is not modernizing; it’s regression to the advent of sound, if you’ll allow the hyperbole.

Cameras are now ubiquitous accessories, so there is much untrod ground in this series and the approach. It must be trod if found footage is not to die by atrophy.

My Rating Scale

Since my post on lists not being complete, which is an essence an amendment to my initial manifesto, I have not written many reviews, but I will have cause to with 61 Days of Halloween coming up. Keeping that in mind, it has come to my attention, both through my own ruminating and from some comments, that there is a slight incongruity to my rating scale. I have changed it very slightly at the bottom end.

I have not yet, but may still, sample my scores and average them. I know I tend to grade generously and don’t really make apologies for that. However, I’ve realized that the top end definition doesn’t mesh with the bottom end. In short, it’s easier, by definition for a 10 to be assigned than a 1. More to the point, it’s been easier to assign a 2 than a 1. Therefore, both the definition for a 10 and a 1 now include references to best in the year and downplays all-time, since that’s hard to gauge instantaneously.

Here is the altered rating scale:

Below is my rating scale. I try to be as precise as possible in describing what each number signifies. If you need further clarification please feel free to leave a comment.

1. = Terrible, no redeeming qualities, one of the worst films of the year, occasionally ever.
2. =Awful but of some minute value- among the worst of the year.
3. =A film with one maybe two strong elements but overall unforgivably poor.
4. =A film with a few mistakes too big to overlook.
5. =Marginally bad, a film with it’s good points but ultimately suffering from a fatal flaw that prevents it from achieving decency.
6. =A mediocre film; not bad but nothing special.
7. =Better than average, definitely worth viewing.
8. =A standout film with promise that is not quite fulfilled.
9. =A film which is just an iota, a minor fix or two short of greatness.
10. =A great film. Best genre can achieve, contender for best of year & rarely all-time. There are gradations in all ratings.

The Dichotomous Parallel Between MP3s and Digital Copies

Recently, I drew the parallel between the digitization of music and that of cinema. Digitization in terms of the end user’s home entertainment product. I often describe myself as being caught between two times because I always like to have links to the past, while conversely staying fairly current. I remember when MP3s first came around it was amazing. It was like “Ermagerd, I can listen to music on the computer” (That is, if we talked that back then).

Maybe it had a little to do with the fact that the internet was still in its infancy and we all either turned a blind eye to, or were ignorant to, the piracy it incurred. Eventually, the free music party came to a halt. While Lars Ulrich was neither the right person, nor an un-douche, he had a point about Napster. The fact of the matter is the word monetization wasn’t even in the vernacular back then. In the end, it was Apple with the inception of iTunes and the iPod that legitimized MP3s. Now, there was and is music business tussling there too. The point of the mini-history lesson is: Music on a computer was instantly fine with the masses. I can’t say it was preferred, even I have to give it to certain formats (even the analog ones) for having un-reproduceable qualities, but it was widely and quickly accepted as a norm.

With movies that’s not really the case. I’m citing mostly myself in this instance but the shelves of a Best Buy and the warehouses of Amazon will back me up on this, films on physical media are still king even if not by much. However, having some sort of file saves room. I had a clutter of CDs that I then jammed into my iTunes and could access it at the touch of a button on my iPod. With movies I’d still rather hold the disc.

There are gray areas which I’ll come to, devices may play a large part. Apple didn’t just start iTunes, as I mentioned they added an accessory. So, yes, the new album I both wouldn’t be something I physically received, but I’d access it through a device.

This tactile obsession is a bit odd and interesting. I think the volume of streaming done on Netflix and Amazon will indicate that we’re fine with cutting the rental store out. We just want to see a movie. People have been watching movies on TV since there was TV, and even more frequently since the advent of HBO. However, that’s watching a movie. Owning a movie up until recently has meant possessing a physical copy of the film.

Even within the realm of digital film there’s a slight stigma I feel. I like having as a bonus a digital copy of a film … on a disc that I can download into my iTunes. However, Ultraviolet annoys me and is something I’ve not used and I think many others feel the same way, and I have access to digital versions of many Disney films I’ve purchase, which remain unstreamed. It still comes down to having a box with a film in it feeling more like owning it even though the issue of space is still present.

Perhaps, this is a slower evolution, or maybe physical copies of films on one media or another will never die our for home video use. Perhaps it’ll be smaller or less successful films that go digital only, while the blockbusters and new classics that can still make a killing on video will get DVDs and Blu-Rays and whatever comes next. I don’t know the answer; time will tell. I just thought it was such a jarring juxtaposition for me personally of how readily I accepted digital representations of one artform but struggle with another. Furthermore, it’s confined to a feeling of ownership, of wanting to have that film in my grasp. I can watch any old thing by any number of streaming methods even as a first viewing but ownership still equates to a holding the film, and I’m sure I’m not alone there. That may change for me and for many some day but it hasn’t yet.